England's long list leaves those who failed to make cut beyond consolation | Vic Marks


Any player not included in the 55-man group named by selectors has little hope of an international future

There must be some grumpy English professional cricketers out there this weekend. Let me try to bowdlerize their thoughts: “Our wise selectors have plucked out 55 players for training ahead of the proposed international matches this summer and I do not appear to be among them. 55 represents no fewer than five cricket teams so this is a source of some disappointment since I thought that I might still have the chance of the ultimate honour, playing for my country, in the foreseeable future. This now seems a rather distant dream. So it’s back to the nets, whenever that is allowed for the journeymen dirt-trackers. Que sera, sera.” The unbowdlerized version probably would not take so long and it might sully your morning.

Most of the names on the longest list ever produced by the England selectors are predictable and by and large they come from the obvious sources. No one employed by Derbyshire, Glamorgan, Leicestershire and (promoted) Northamptonshire has been selected; Surrey provide the most players with nine (they signed Reece Topley in the winter); there are seven from Lancashire and six from Yorkshire and Somerset. One oddity is that Essex, the county champions in two of the past three years, has just one player selected, Dan Lawrence.

Related: England summer plans gather pace with 55 players named in training squad

Related: Lockdown's biggest sporting lesson? That imperfection is valuable too | Emma John

Continue reading...