David Smith says that circumstances show he clearly intended to include Bialco in a bet in June, when he wrote Bailarico
A 60-year-old punter from Loughborough says he is “gutted” that the betting arbitrator IBAS has ruled against him in a dispute with Betfred worth £189,000. David Smith was paid £23,000 for a six-horse bet he placed in June, as five of the horses won, but believes he should have had £212,000 on the grounds that he clearly intended to include Bialco, a winner, rather than Bailarico, the bet’s only loser.
Related: Gold Cup favourite Kemboy banned after owners blocked from running horses
Newbury
1.10 Bullfinch 1.40 Bright Eyed Eagle 2.15 Mishriff 2.50 I'm Available 3.25 Hamish 4.00 Zeyzoun 4.35 Teruntum Star (nb) 5.05 Mr Smith
Doncaster
1.50 She's A Unicorn 2.25 Lady G 3.00 Magnetised 3.35 Pendleton 4.10 Caravan Of Hope 4.45 Passion And Glory 5.15 Casting Spells
Cheltenham
2.00 L'Air Du Vent 2.35 Al Dancer 3.10 Meldrum Lad 3.45 Dinons 4.20 Getariver 4.55 Mustmeetalady 5.30 Benny's Bridge (nap)
Newcastle
5.25 Anyonecanhaveitall 6.00 Tadreej 6.30 Ventura Destiny 7.00 Jazz Style 7.30 Trinity Girl 8.00 Millicent Fawcett 8.30 High Fort